|Fornshell asleep at the wheel with false statement|
|Written by Mike Mayleben|
|Monday, 12 December 2011 23:20|
There are only 3 real options to describe the false statement David Fornshell made today in an article in the Middletown Journal:
Here is David Fornshell's response to Denise Callahan of the Middletown Journal of the motion filed today, "Prosecutor David Fornshell said he finds it a little “ironic” that Berry would raise ineffective assistance of counsel arguments, since she has been an attorney of record on the case during at least the last two trials."
ARE YOU SERIOUS? Where in the world have you been? Have you even followed this trial? Anyone that has would know that Michele Berry-Godsey was ONLY involved in getting the conviction overturned after the first trial, and had nothing to do with the second and third trials. I mean call me captain obvious but all you had to do was pay a little attention to know this. As a matter of fact, papers were filed to remove her name from the docket so that it would only reflect the names of trial counsel.
It appears David Fornshell is merely a Rachel Hutzel puppet. Maybe this is why he couldn't beat her to be the prosecutor and had to wait for her to move on to get an appointment from a buddy.
Here is another concerning comment made by the un-elected Warren County Prosecutor as written in the article by Denise Callahan of the Middletown Journal -
He also said the bathtub issue is new and equally puzzling to him. “It’s interesting that on one hand there’s this argument that there was not sufficient evidence to support a murder charge,” he said. “But on the other hand they’re saying this bathtub was so damning if you will, or prejudicial in terms of it proving Widmer murdered his wife, that allowing it in and not suppressing it early on was actually ineffective assistance of counsel.”
Shouldn't the Prosecutor put our Constitutional Rights 1st???????? How about our Civil Liberties???????? Guess it's only about winning at the Warren County Prosecutor's office and not about protecting 'We The People'.
David Fornshell is either lying in hopes of confusing the facts of this case or he's incompetently asleep at the wheel - you make the decision, I'm just pointing out the facts.
Here's a screenshot of the article, incase Fornshell claims he was misquoted like Russel Uptegrove claimed.